|
/
Zope
/
Apsis
/
Pound Mailing List
/
Archive
/
2005
/
2005-06
/
Pound, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.x - no fork
[
Pound really slow on RHEL-4 + signal 11s / ... ]
[
Issue with Pound, Client Timeouts, IE and saving ... ]
Pound, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.x - no fork
Pavel Francirek <pavel(at)toplist.cz> |
2005-06-11 11:36:22 |
[ FULL ]
|
Hello,
it seems like pound doesn't fork on shiny new Debian release 3.1 (sarge)
with kernel 2.6.x. Ps, top shows only one process. When using 2.4.x
kernel everithing looks fine. Does it mean that on 2.6.x kernel is used
different model (thread?). But with HyperThread processor (P4 EM64T) is
used only one virtual processor.
With older Debian release (woody) work everything too (2.4 and 2.6
kernel)
Pavel
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.x - no fork
"Simon Matter" <simon.matter(at)ch.sauter-bc.com> |
2005-06-11 15:30:23 |
[ FULL ]
|
> Hello,[...]
What does 'ps faxm' show? I think it's because NPTL systems don't show
threads as separate processes anymore. Users of other distros had the same
experience years ago :)
Simon
[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.x - no fork
Pavel Francirek <pavel(at)toplist.cz> |
2005-06-13 12:09:30 |
[ FULL ]
|
Hello,
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 15:30 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:[...]
Thanks, now I see it. But it still seem it doesn't spread on both
'virtual' processors and takes all (according to top) CPU time only on
one.
Pavel
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.x - no fork
"Simon Matter" <simon.matter(at)ch.sauter-bc.com> |
2005-06-13 14:36:39 |
[ FULL ]
|
> Hello,[...][...][...]
I almost never see something spread on both virtual CPU's, because they
don't really exist and almost nothing can be done in parallel on those
CPU's. The HT thing is much more PR than technology.
Simon
|
|
|
|