This sounds like there is a mis-designed service involved that has state that is server-scoped instead of session-scoped.

Robert Segall wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:00:53 +0200 "Cedric LACROIX" <clc@ibee.fr> wrote:

I'd like to limit the number of sessions on Pound to only one per
back-end servers.


Out of curiosity: why on earth would you want to do that? For the life
of me I can't imagine a scenario where you would want a single session
to be active.

-- 
Ted Dunning
Chief Scientist
Veoh Networks