|
/
Zope
/
Apsis
/
Pound Mailing List
/
Archive
/
2006
/
2006-05
/
pound scheduling method ?
[
SSL Headers / Will Tatam <wtatam(at)premierit.c... ]
[
strange behaviour - stops balancing after doing ... ]
pound scheduling method ?
Oskar Casquero Oiarzabal <oskar.casquero(at)ehu.es> |
2006-05-26 11:39:18 |
[ FULL ]
|
Hello,
I'm going to test Pound for balancing in our Plone based e-learning
platform. I have setup a cluster in the following way: Squid -> Pound ->
ZeoClients
(http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/simple-zope-clustering-with-squid-and-pound).
I have configured pound with cookie value session tracking, which works
well, but I can't see what type of scheduling method pound implements (I
thought that it was round robin, but it doesn't seem to be it). Perhaps
I haven't configured Pound properly.
The pound configuration file is the following:
ListenHTTP
Address 127.0.0.1
Port 8080
Service
Session
Type Cookie
ID "_ZopeId"
TTL 1800
End
BackEnd
Address 192.168.1.5
Port 8080
End
BackEnd
Address 192.168.1.5
Port 8081
End
BackEnd
Address 192.168.1.5
Port 8082
End
End
End
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Oskar
[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] pound scheduling method ?
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch> |
2006-05-29 18:58:48 |
[ FULL ]
|
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:39 +0200, Oskar Casquero Oiarzabal wrote:[...]
I'm not sure why the scheduling method is important, but if it really
matters to you: Pound distributes the requests randomly to the
back-ends. The actual distribution is uniform, but weighed as per the
priority parameter (a back-end with priority 2 is twice as likely to get
a request as a back-end with priority 1).
It goes without saying that the above applies only in the absence of
sessions - with sessions this is true only of the initial request.[...]
|
|
|
|