> Hello,[...][...][...]

You're right. But at least the archives don't lose attachments. So you
can download it at

http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-06/1151690135000


Regards,
Florian

> Aargh!  It looks like the list software you guys use rips away any[...]

Attachments can be downloaded from the list archives.

Simon

On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 02:35 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:[...]

Thanks for the suggestion - I'll put it high on the wish list. Right now
we're in feature freeze mode until 2.1, but we'll get to it right
afterwards.[...]

On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:55 +0200, Florian Wagner wrote:[...]

Nice, but I have a few questions:

- why limit this to COPY? At least MOVE uses the Destination header as
well, so why not handle all such headers?

- why just replace https with https? Shouldn't the host/port parts be
replaced as well with the back-end info as well?

I'd be happy to hear what you think. In any case this is for after 2.1 -
we're in feature freeze right now.[...]

> - why limit this to COPY? At least MOVE uses the Destination header
as[...]

During writing the patch I only came across COPY requests. If I remember
correctly a svn move translates into a DELETE and COPY. I could, of
course, be wrong...
[...]

Because I didn't think that far... ;)


Regards,
Florian

On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 10:28 +1000, Mike Withers wrote:
[...]

Usually you pass your config file as the argument to -c.  So it's not
your config file but rather the lack of one ;-)

/usr/local/sbin/pound -c /path/to/my/config.file

Still, it's not correct for pound to segfault under any circumstances,
so that's a bug.

Regards,
Cliff

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 21:30 -0500, Omar El-Domeiri wrote:[...]

URL "^$" or URL "^\.$" would probably do the trick. In any case, telling
us what you tried and what doesn't work would be helpful...[...]

Hello,
 
I am very pleased to discover your product : pound. And as I understand
right it's only working on a Unix/Linux like OS software.
Maybe I may ask you an advice.
 
I have 2 Web production platform's running on Windows 2000 server and IIS
and need the option to  redirect: requests distributing the URL  among the
two servers according to the requested URL. On this moment we only have one
WAN IP-address and all websites running on one webserver.
To migrate to a second webserver or to make a separation of the websites, a
second webserver is neccesary. 
I wonder how to manage that with your wonderfull product: pound.
 
As example: 
Directly behind the SDSL-router a Linux-platform is needed running POUND.
Pound has programmed to work as followes:
URL: www.abc.com is redirected to Webserver-1 and URL: www.xyz.com is
redirected to webserver-2 
 
Is that right?
 
Will there be small "stand-alone" platforms running Linux, like a lot of
Firewalls as NetAsq are working?
 
Thanks for your patiance reading and answering this email; I will appreciate
that very much.
 
For now, with regards,
 
Dirk Dekker

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: pound(at)apsis.ch [mailto:pound(at)apsis.ch] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 14 juli 2006 22:23
Aan: dirk dekker
Onderwerp: Welcome to [Pound Mailing List]

Hello "dirk dekker" <hf.dekker(at)chello.nl>,

you are now subscribed to Pound Mailing List.

Send your mails to: pound(at)apsis.ch

If you want to unsubscribe from Pound Mailing List, send a mail with subject
(not body!):

unsubscribe 

to: pound(at)apsis.ch

Yours, roseg(at)apsis.ch

Return Receipt
                                                                           
   Your       RE: Welcome to [Pound Mailing List]                          
   document:                                                               
                                                                           
   was        jbrown(at)camsys.com                                            
   received                                                                
   by:                                                                     
                                                                           
   at:        07/14/2006 04:53:46 PM

On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:28 +0200, Hennie Dekker wrote:[...]

No, it works on any "sufficiently" POSIX-like system, including cygwin.
[...]

Almost. Pound does NOT redirect, but passes the requests.
[...]

If interested we could probably do something like that, as is probably
the case for quite a few members of this list...[...]

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 16:36 +0200, Michael Stegemann wrote:[...]

I have no idea what it means that "AOL can't handle with
Session-Cookies". A cookie is a function of the browser, so the network
has nothing to do with it.

In any case I would suggest you go to the latest 2.x release, as there
are some problems with the 1.x session code.[...]

Hi All

Cliff, thanks for your reply. I missed it first time round - I was letting 
pound assume the default config file path ie /usr/local/etc/pound.cfg which 
it seemed to do. I'll be more careful in future.

The version of pound I was having trouble with was 2.0.4 on a slackware 
10.2 distro. I have switched to to pound version 2.0 and have been able to 
install OK.

Given that I have had trouble with version 2.0.4 and 2.0.9 does anyone have 
a suggestion as to what tools and/or procedures I might use to try to track 
down the bugs in the later versions. Hopefully I could then give some 
meaningful bug reports.

Thanks Mike

At 04:15 PM 7/07/2006 -0700, you wrote:[...]

I'm sorry... I forgot to attach patch :/ So here it is

Kepi

Po, čec 31, 2006 ve 03:32:41 +0200, Ondrej Kudlik napsal:[...]

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:36 +0200, Ondra Kudlik wrote:[...]

I could not find any patch in this email too... :(

Regards[...]

attached files are only accessible through web archiv, but I
can't still see my message here...

So, for now... you can download it on
http://dev.igloonet.cz/os/pound/pound_2.0.9_htmlerr.patch

Kepi

Po, čec 31, 2006 ve 01:14:05 +0200, Johannes Findeisen napsal:[...]

Everyone,

I really do apologise for this - I have been absolutely slammed with work 
both at work and at home. I must say that I did not realise that the new 
version was waiting for me.

Please accept my apologies, I will send the information as soon as I can so 
that it can be included in the version after 2.1.

Regards
Richard



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Segall" <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
To: <pound(at)apsis.ch>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Release 2.1

[...]

Po, čec 31, 2006 ve 01:24:07 +0200, Robert Segall napsal:[...]

I had simmilar problems as Richard Hamilton report but with 2.0.9
version and RewriteLocation set to 0 everything works fine!

Thanks for you great work
[...]

All reports loaded, btw

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Hamilton <ricky.hamilton(at)btopenworld.com>
To: pound(at)apsis.ch <pound(at)apsis.ch>
Sent: Mon Jul 31 08:03:40 2006
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Release 2.1

Everyone,

I really do apologise for this - I have been absolutely slammed with work 
both at work and at home. I must say that I did not realise that the new 
version was waiting for me.

Please accept my apologies, I will send the information as soon as I can so 
that it can be included in the version after 2.1.

Regards
Richard



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Segall" <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
To: <pound(at)apsis.ch>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Release 2.1

[...]

[...]

Hi all,

Is this patch included in 2.1 release or/and can I use it with Pound 2.1 
release ?

Ondra Kudlik wrote:[...][...]
>>> I'm sorry... I forgot to attach patch :/ So here it is
>>>       [...][...]
[...]

Hi Robert,

Did you look into the issue of other non-thread-safe functions? As I 
pointed out in:

http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-07/1151804232000#1151962139000

there are issues at least in the internal functions log_time and 
log_bytes which use a static buffer, and depending on the platform, 
there might be issues in localtime and gethostbyname.

Also, I haven't confirmed it with 2.0.9, but 2.0.4 still has at least 
one memory leak somewhere, our pound process grows pretty quickly to 
several hundred megabytes, though I have to say I have no idea 
where/why. Did something get fixed in that respect since then?

Thanks,

Jacques.

At 13:24 31/07/2006, Robert Segall wrote:[...]

Po, čec 31, 2006 ve 02:20:04 +0200, Ondra Kudlik napsal:[...]

I found one important problem. When I have RewriteLocation set to 0
i cannot go to directories withou ending slash.

So if i have directory data and I go to
http://www.something.com/data it
timeouts. I know that server
redirect this to http://www.something.com/data/ 

I'm not sure on global impact but it is very serious bug for us :/

Thanks for any idea
[...]

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 16:50 +0200, Jacques Caron wrote:[...]

Yes, these are fixed as well.
[...]

We have fixed a potential memory leak in the authorisation decoding. I
don't really know if that covers it all.[...]

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:41 +0200, Ondra Kudlik wrote:[...]

Most web servers reply with a redirect when the client requests a
directory. The sequence is:

- client requests /data
- server replies with a redirect to /data/
- client requests /data/
- server replies with the default for the directory (index.html,
listing, etc)

That means that without RewriteRedirect you won't be able to get it
working the way you expect.

What exactly happens with RewriteRedirect? Where is the client
redirected to? Is rewriting working (never/sometimes/always) as
expected?[...]

Po, čec 31, 2006 ve 06:26:20 +0200, Robert Segall napsal:[...]

yes, I know this, but...[...]
You meen RewriteLocation or RewriteRedirect is still in Pound 2.X ?[...]

So, to be clear, I have this config:

-----------------------
ListenHTTP
	Address	X.X.X.X
	Port	80

	RewriteLocation 1 # default
	
	Client 20
End

Service
	HeadRequire	"Host: .*somehost.cz.*"
	BackEnd
		Address	127.0.0.1
		Port	8000
	End
End
----------------------

1/ With this config, I can go to www.somehost.cz/data and it
correctly redirect to www.somehost.cz/data/

but I have also set RewriteRules to redirect hosts without www to
www variant and when i go to somehost.cz it gives me redirect loop.

2/ When I change RewriteLocation to 0 redirect from nonwww variant
to www variant work great, so i can go to somehost.cz and it
redirects me to www.somehost.cz

but when i go to www.somehost.cz/data it is loading and loading and
after long time it timeouts.

In pound 1.x a was happy with parametr RewriteRedirect 2 but if I'm
right it was replaced by Change3x (or something like) and then with
RewriteLocation

If you need more details or I'm doing something in bad way, let me
know.

Have a nice day
[...]