|
/
Zope
/
Apsis
/
Pound Mailing List
/
Archive
/
2006
/
2006-09
/
unknown directive "ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted
[
ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer ... ]
[
Pound and maximum fork rate / "Bernhard ... ]
unknown directive "ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted
James <mylists2004(at)gmail.com> |
2006-09-12 00:24:48 |
[ FULL ]
|
I get this error message when pound starts: " unknown directive
"ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted" My config file is below. I have no idea how to
troubleshoot this. Any suggestions? I'm using version 2.1 on Debian.
User "www-data"
Group "www-data"
LogLevel 1
ExtendedHTTP 1
Alive 20
ListenHTTP
Address 10.0.0.25
Port 80
WebDAV 1
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.2.1,80,1
EndGroup
ListenHTTPS *,443 /etc/cacert.pem
"ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL"
AddHeader "Front-End-Https: on"
User nobody
Group nobody
RootJail /usr/share/pound
ListenHTTP *,80
ListenHTTPS *,443 /usr/share/ssl/certs/pound.pem
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL
ExtendedHTTP 1
LogLevel 2
# Catch-all server(s)
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 10.0.0.25,80,1
EndGroup
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] unknown directive "ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted
Blake Barnett <shadoi(at)nanovoid.com> |
2006-09-12 00:33:20 |
[ FULL ]
|
The default configuration included with Debian is wrong. I think
it's for the old version of pound? See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356466
Anyway, copy a correct example configuration from the README or from
the website.
-Blake
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, James wrote:
[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] unknown directive "ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted
James <mylists2004(at)gmail.com> |
2006-09-12 01:20:15 |
[ FULL ]
|
The config file, which is included with my previous message, is not a
default that comes with Debian. I shouldn't be getting this error
message...theoretically.
On 9/11/06, Blake Barnett <shadoi(at)nanovoid.com> wrote:[...]
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] unknown directive "ExtendedHTTP 1 " - aborted
Blake Barnett <shadoi(at)nanovoid.com> |
2006-09-12 01:37:58 |
[ FULL ]
|
Ah, well regardless, it's the same problem. Update to the 2.x syntax.
-Blake
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:20 PM, James wrote:
[...][...][...]
|
|
|
|