/ Zope / Apsis / Pound Mailing List / Archive / 2007 / 2007-02 / Re: [Pound Mailing List] Does pound favor one backend? - add link to 2.2.5

[ << ] [ >> ]

[ pound errors / Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ... ] [ Https redirection question / "Wassink, mw. ... ]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Does pound favor one backend? - add link to 2.2.5
Kenneth Burgener <kenneth(at)mail1.ttak.org>
2007-02-27 23:06:03 [ FULL ]
Albert wrote:[...]

You may want to add a link to the 2.2.5 under the STABLE
VERSIONS/EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS download section.  I was able to
determine what the URL would be based on the 2.2.4 download, but it
would probably be helpful to others if it were added to the list.

Kenneth

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Does pound favor one backend?
Kenneth Burgener <kenneth(at)mail1.ttak.org>
2007-02-28 00:06:56 [ FULL ]
Kenneth Burgener wrote:[...]


I downloaded the 2.2.3 source code, as a previous email mentioned 2.2.3
did not have the Address family error, compiled and ran that code.  I no
longer get the Address family not supported problem, but I am still
seeing the very uneven distribution of load balance.

I compiled again with dynscale disabled:

# ./configure --prefix=/usr/pound --disable-dynscale
# make
# make install

Now there was a very clear cut even distribution 40/40/42.  I like the
idea of a dynamic distribution, but when you see numbers like 60/20/25
on 3 identical servers, makes you wonder if there is a flaw with the
dynamic distribution logic.

I am now compiling the 2.2.5 to see if I can get better results with that.

Thanks,
Kenneth

MailBoxer