We use LVS in Direct Routing mode. In general, this works well, but one thing to be aware of is the time between service checks is Direct Routing mode - if one Pound node goes down between checks it's possible that a user might get a timeout or 503 etc.
Cheers,
D
On 6/5/07, justin randell <justin.randell@gmail.com> wrote:
hi,
On 6/5/07, Carbonell, Yann <Yann.Carbonell@banctec.ca> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could suggest me a way to cluster Pound.
>
> As it is becoming a central point of failure in my organisation I am looking
> for ideas and feedback from your various experiences .
>
> I already checked several solutions like LVS / piranha solution for RH, as
> well as DNS round robin (why not ?).
we use wackamole and spread to ensure that the IPs we have in DNS are
always available if a pound load balancer goes down.
let me know if you want more detail.
cheers
justin
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject 'unsubscribe' to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact roseg@apsis.ch
for questions.
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2007/2007-06/1180973097000/1180993772000