With the following config all requests go to the backend in the first 
group irrespective of the service accessed?

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.21,443 /usr/local/etc/server1.pem 
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1
EndGroup

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.17,444 /usr/local/etc/server2.pem 
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.1.16,80,1
EndGroup

i.e. if you try to connect to https://192.168.1.17:444 pound gives a 
response from BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1 !!

/NB. The pound version is v1.10/

And apologies for the last 2 posts before thinking, this one I'm pretty 
sure is an issue....

Regards,
Malcolm.

In Pound 1.X Listeners are not tied directly to the groups.

Your config will need to look something like this:

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.21,443 /usr/local/etc/server1.pem
ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.17,444 /usr/local/etc/server2.pem 

UrlGroup ".*"
HeadRequire Host ".*server1.com"
BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1
EndGroup

UrlGroup ".*"
HeadRequire Host ".*server2.com"
BackEnd 192.168.1.16,80,1
EndGroup

Hope this helps.

John D.

********** Original Email *********
** To:   pound(at)apsis.ch
** From: lists(at)loadbalancer.org
** Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:57:08 +0100
**********


With the following config all requests go to the backend in the first 
group irrespective of the service accessed?

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.21,443 /usr/local/etc/server1.pem 
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1
EndGroup

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.17,444 /usr/local/etc/server2.pem 
UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.1.16,80,1
EndGroup

i.e. if you try to connect to https://192.168.1.17:444 pound gives a 
response from BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1 !!

/NB. The pound version is v1.10/

And apologies for the last 2 posts before thinking, this one I'm pretty 
sure is an issue....

Regards,
Malcolm.
 
[...]

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 20:57 +0100, Malcolm wrote:[...]

I think what you really want is

ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.21,443 /usr/local/etc/server1.pem 
ListenHTTPS 192.168.1.17,444 /usr/local/etc/server2.pem 

UrlGroup ".*"
BackEnd 192.168.1.78,80,1
BackEnd 192.168.1.16,80,1
EndGroup
[...]

Robert Segall wrote:[...]
Robert,

Thank you, but does that mean that both https certs/ports will be load 
balanced over the two servers?
I'd like to have the first cert/port go to one backend and the second 
cert/port go to the other backend.
Is that possible with Pound?

Thanks,
Regards,
Malcolm.

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 08:13 +0100, lists wrote:[...]

Only with 2.x, with 1.x you'll need two separate instances.[...]

Robert,

Ah, that explains it, thanks.


Robert Segall wrote:[...][...][...]