Hello,

can nobody help me?

any help would be appreciated

kind regards

Philipp Michels

[...]

Philipp Michels wrote:[...]


What it looks like you are attempting to do is forward on the HTTP
request to an HTTPS server, correct?  Pound does not have client HTTPS
capabilities.  Pound can only receive HTTPS requests, unwrap them, and
then forward on HTTP requests.

If you would like to do a redirect back to the client, and have the
client directly accesses the HTTPS server, then yes, Pound can do this.

Kenneth

Dave Steinberg wrote:[...][...][...]

Either "301 Moved Permanently"
(http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2)
or
"307 Temporary Redirect"
(http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8)
are
the HTTP responses to redirect a POST to a different URL without the
user agent changing it to a GET.

Not sure how well redirecting POSTs supported by browsers though - read
the notes for status codes 301, 302, 303 and 307, and do careful
testing! http://www.browsercam.com/
might help; I'd be interested in
knowing whether you are successful or not!

Regards,

Russ
[...]

I'll read the information but I'm not going to redirect Post pages. I'm
going to write an error page and redirect to the error page if it's coming
through http. That seemed like the fastest way to get this accomplished. 

I'm still redirecting non Post pages though.

Leonard

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Odom [mailto:listsignups(at)zolv.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:25 AM
To: pound(at)apsis.ch
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] mod_rewrite

Dave Steinberg wrote:[...][...][...]

Either "301 Moved Permanently"
(http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2)
or
"307 Temporary Redirect"
(http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.8)
are
the HTTP responses to redirect a POST to a different URL without the
user agent changing it to a GET.

Not sure how well redirecting POSTs supported by browsers though - read
the notes for status codes 301, 302, 303 and 307, and do careful
testing! http://www.browsercam.com/
might help; I'd be interested in
knowing whether you are successful or not!

Regards,

Russ
[...]

On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 03:02 +0200, Aigner wrote:[...]

It sounds very much like you are using an older version. 2.4c does NOT
use the --enable-dynscale in the autoconf, but only the config file
directive. Check your version.[...]

On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 17:11 +0100, Anthony Underwood wrote:[...]

Thanks for pointing that out - it will be fixed in the next release.[...]

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:11 +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:[...]

It's quite inoffensive: it really means that ab closed a connection
before receiving the full response. In practice it doesn't happen that
much, though it can't be avoided completely.[...]

> It sounds very much like you are using an older version. 2.4c [...]
Also if compiling with only "--with-log=LOG_LOCAL7" I get the same error.

Calling "pound -V" gives me 2.4c as version information.

--
Oliver Aigner
[...]

Well, you were fully right.
init.d script called older version 2.0.6 in /usr/sbin. But the new version
resides in /usr/local/sbin.

The new version works like a charm. It is really a software master-piece :-)
If you are into Zope and need an high performance and reliable front-end,
then choose pound !

Thanks,
Oliver Aigner
[...]