/ Zope / Apsis / Pound Mailing List / Archive / 2008 / 2008-03 / Re: [Pound Mailing List] Problems with Pound 2.4

[ << ] [ >> ]

[ HTTPSHeaders option? / Tom Fernandes ... ] [ Pound and CIPSO / Alessio <a.cervellin(at)acm.o... ]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Problems with Pound 2.4
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
2008-03-27 18:45:38 [ FULL ]
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 00:56 +0100, mrhotstandby(at)gmail.com wrote:[...]

Strange. Anybody else seen this?[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Problem upgrading from 2.3.2 to 2.4 on older Linux
Scott Larson <stl(at)iowainteractive.com>
2008-03-27 18:47:22 [ FULL ]
Maybe it could be made a compile time option?  If there are  
people who can benefit from it I don't want them punished just because  
it breaks for some of us.[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] HTTPSHeaders option?
Tom Fernandes <anyaddress(at)gmx.net>
2008-03-27 21:25:28 [ FULL ]
Hi,

On Thursday, 27. March 2008, Dave Steinberg wrote:[...]

yup - that worked.


thanks,


Tom

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Losing the wrong sessions
Frans Luteijn <frans.luteijn(at)xout.eu>
2008-03-28 10:39:19 [ FULL ]
Hello Robert,

I have compiled Pound on a OpenSuSE 10.2 64 bit system with the
following commands:

./configure --with-owner=wwwrun --prefix=/usr/local/pound/pound-2.4
make

After that my install command was:

make DESTDIR=/home/frans/loadbal/Pound-2.4/root/ install
tar cf - -C root . |gzip -9 >pound.tgz

I unpacked the tarball on two cluster nodes, both OpenSuSE 10.2 64 bit.
The kernel is 2.6.21 on all our servers.

If you need more information I am willingly to give it.

I hope you can reproduce this problem, so you can solve this.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Frans Luteijn.


Xout Europe BV
De Virieusingel 4
P.O. Box 223
5300 AE  Zaltbommel
The Netherlands
P:	+31(0)88 77 88 200
F:	+31(0)88 77 88 299
E:	frans.luteijn(at)xout.eu
W:	www.xout.eu



Robert Segall wrote:[...][...][...]
Attachments:  
text.html text/html 2158 Bytes

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound and CIPSO
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
2008-03-31 18:40:21 [ FULL ]
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 17:35 +0100, Alessio wrote:[...]

CIPSO is usually implemented at the kernel level, and the tagging is
(should be?) transparent to applications. As such, packets will be
received and sent OK (Pound is a user-mode program).

Pound itself does NOT know anything about CIPSO, so you must have the
tagging done by the kernel on outgoing packets (if supported).[...]

MailBoxer