In our environment, we only have one single application on the backend servers. If it fails on one server, that instance needs to be taken out of the pool. In other words, HTTP response code interpretation is most definitively useful.

Just my 2 cents.

/Eirik


On Jul 9, 2008, at 08:31, tyntas wrote:

Indeed,

some sort of evaluation of backends health from its HTTP responce would
not be a key feature in terms of usage frequency, but still irreplacible
at some cases.

j.

Martin rašė:
Alfonso Espitia ha scritto:
I guess I need more background info.  At the moment I don't see how that
would be a good feature request.

If I have 20 apps running on a machine, and one of them is crashing, I
wouldn't want that server to be considered "offline" since I have 19
other apps that I want load balanced.  I just need to fix the 1.



I would like to see  that feature as option to set in pound.cfg  :):)

--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact roseg@apsis.ch for questions.





--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact roseg@apsis.ch for questions.