/ Zope / Apsis / Pound Mailing List / Archive / 2008 / 2008-09 / Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound on

[ << ] [ >> ]

[ making pound completely transparent for my ... ] [ BPG managed Network & pound / "Jens ... ]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound on
Dave Steinberg <dave(at)redterror.net>
2008-09-11 21:38:33 [ FULL ]
<snip>
[...]

Or 'cat' or m4.  More below.
[...]

I don't fully understand your question, but let me give you a rough 
outline of what I think would do what you're asking:

=== header.conf ====
User        "proxy"
Group       "proxy"
RootJail    "/var/pound"
Alive       15
TimeOut     120
LogLevel    5
Daemon      1
Control     "/tmp/pound.sock"
DynScale    0

ListenHTTP
         # localhost, for testing
         Address a.b.c.d
         Port 80
         RewriteLocation 0
         HeadRemove "X-Forwarded-Proto"
End
===
=== dom1.conf ====
### special handling for *.check*.geekisp.com
Service "foo1"
         HeadRequire "^Host:[ \t]*foo\.bar\.com$"
         Backend
                 Address backend_1
                 Port 80
         end
end
===
=== dom2.conf ===
Service "baz"
         HeadRequire "^Host:[ \t]*baz\.bar\.com$"
         Backend
                 Address backend_1
                 Port 81
         end
end
===

That's it.  Just 'cat' them all together and you get your pound.conf 
file.  This would send requests to foo.bar.com to "backend_1" on port 80 
and requests to "baz.bar.com" to backend_1 on port 81.

Regards,[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Not a proxy
Dave Steinberg <dave(at)redterror.net>
2008-09-21 18:08:39 [ FULL ]
Jean-Pierre van Melis wrote:[...]

DSR, aka Direct Server Return, is not directly supported by pound.  You 
might be able to make it work if you did some magic, but I haven't heard 
of anybody doing it.

Regards,[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] socket closing/shutdown
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
2008-09-22 17:47:23 [ FULL ]
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:21 -0400, Albert wrote:[...]

I am quite sure that adding a shutdown() would not hurt. However, having
too many open files is not likely to be related to this, but rather to
the total allowed number of open files.[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] pound transparency
IVANCSO Krisztian <pound(at)percek.hu>
2008-09-22 22:54:02 [ FULL ]
Hi!


Jean-Pierre van Melis írta:[...]

I was the perpetrator. ;-)

[...]

I don't maintain the code. :-(
I wrote this patch for 2.0 b4.

It needs a special iptables module which does the hard work
(iptable_tproxy implemented by Balabit Ltd.).
The link to the module on page is not up to date.
New link: http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/tproxy/

Some information about tproxy:
http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/

TProxy is not a cross-platform solution so I think there is no chance to
include in the normal codebase.

Best regatds,
ivan

Re: [Pound Mailing List] pound transparency
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch>
2008-09-23 18:41:49 [ FULL ]
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:07 +0200, Jean-Pierre van Melis wrote:[...]

If that is what you want, have a look at the OpenBSD pf - I think it
would do this sort of routing.

The original patch seems not to be very portable - as are all
kernel-based solutions.[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List] LogFacility
Dave Steinberg <dave(at)redterror.net>
2008-09-28 04:40:49 [ FULL ]
Anthony L wrote:[...]

There is no such log facility as 'pound'.  Read the syslog man page - 
there is a small set of predefined facilities.  To do what you want, 
there's other ways that vary by the specifics of your syslog 
implementation.  You might ask on a FreeBSD users list and get more 
detailed help.

Regards,[...]

Re: [Pound Mailing List]
Albert <pound(at)alacra.com>
2008-09-29 22:59:23 [ FULL ]
Yes, there is an "Emergency" directive you can use for "Service", which 
will kick in after your BackEnd A becomes unavailable.  As soon as 
BackEnd A is available, pound will switch to it, and stop sending 
requests to the Emergency (BackEnd B) server.

McCollough, Alan wrote:[...]
Attachments:  
text.html text/html 1306 Bytes

MailBoxer