|
/
Zope
/
Apsis
/
Pound Mailing List
/
Archive
/
2009
/
2009-06
/
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Memory Leak
[
Manipulate/Inject HTTP Response Header / ... ]
[
Certificate problem with firefox (resolved) / ... ]
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Memory Leak
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch> |
2009-06-18 17:34:00 |
[ FULL ]
|
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 22:39 +0100, sbr(at)rlfans.com wrote:[...]
Thanks Andrew, this goes into the next release.[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] "Line too long" with 2.4
Robert Segall <roseg(at)apsis.ch> |
2009-06-18 17:35:42 |
[ FULL ]
|
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 19:52 +0200, Eirik Øverby wrote:[...]
In the newest version the default MAXBUF is 4k. You have a compile-time
option to make it larger if you wish.[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Make Pound Aware of Tomcat
Tim Dunphy <bluethundr(at)nylsd.com> |
2009-06-19 04:33:08 |
[ FULL ]
|
it does. this is great. yes, we have rather singular minded devs tho. I
will show this and the other response to them. thank u. we are balancing
two web servers. appreciate the help. I have just read through a good
portion of the o'reilly tomcat book and completely agree that there is no
reason to involve apache.
tim
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:40:36 +0100, John Snowdon
<J.P.Snowdon(at)newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:[...][...][...]
[...]
|
|
|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Make Pound Aware of Tomcat
Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru(at)gmail.com> |
2009-06-19 05:23:20 |
[ FULL ]
|
Yes unless you need hybrid features from apache you usually do not
need apache in front of tomcat. Also I once benchmarked mod_jk and as
you can suspect there is overhead. I do not have the numbers any more,
but it makes sense that you have apache overhead, mod_jk overhead, and
then finally tomcat overhead. It is fairly significant.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Tim Dunphy<bluethundr(at)nylsd.com>
wrote:[...][...]
>>> ah, sorry! I was only including what I thought relevant. here is
more
>>> complete info. I will be looking into the manpage as suggested.
but the
>>> answer may not be obvious to me from the manpage alone, but I will
do my
>>> best.
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> ## Minimal sample pound.cfg
>>> ##
>>> ## see pound(8) for details
>>>
>>>
>>>
######################################################################
>>> ## global options:
>>>
>>> User "www-data"
>>> Group "www-data"
>>> #RootJail "/chroot/pound"
>>>
>>> ## Logging: (goes to syslog by default)
>>> ## 0 no logging
>>> ## 1 normal
>>> ## 2 extended
>>> ## 3 Apache-style (common log format)
>>> #LogLevel 1
>>>
>>> ## check backend every X secs:
>>> Alive 2
>>>
>>> ## use hardware-accelleration card supported by openssl(1):
>>> "pound.cfg.tomcat" 59L, 1337C
>>> ## use hardware-accelleration card supported by openssl(1):
>>> #SSLEngine "<hw>"
>>>
>>>
>>>
######################################################################
>>> ## listen, redirect and ... to:
>>>
>>> ## redirect all requests on port 80 ("ListenHTTP") to the virtual
IP
>>> address:
>>> ListenHTTP
>>> Address 192.168.1.42
>>> Port 80
>>>
>>> Service
>>> HeadRequire "Host:.*alpha.mysite.com.*"
>>> Url "/index.*"
>>> BackEnd
>>> Address 192.168.1.5
>>> Port 80
>>>
>>> Port 80
>>> End
>>> Session
>>> Type Basic
>>> TTL 300
>>> End
>>> Service
>>> HeadRequire "Host:.*alpha.mysite.com.*"
>>> Url "/index.*"
>>> BackEnd
>>> Address 192.168.1.6
>>> Port 80
>>> End
>>> Session
>>> Type Basic
>>> TTL 300
>>> END
>>> End
>>> End
>>>
>>>
>>> desired url:
>>>
>>> http://alpha.mysite.com/index.jsf
>>>
>>> error:[...][...]
|
|
|
|