Pound Mailing List
Benchmarking Pound SSL with a self signed cert
/ lists account <lists(at)loadbalancer.org>
I cant get Benchmarking of Pound SSL to work with a self signed cert:
openssl s_time -connect 192.168.2.145:443
No CIPHER specified
Collecting connection statistics for 30 seconds
Re: [Pound Mailing List] URL casading Issue
/ "Simon Matter" <simon.matter(at)invoca.ch>
> Hi all
> I have been using Pound in my setup for quite sometime now. I have setup
> various backends so that on the basis of URL request I can fetch pages
> various backend servers. For eg ...
URL casading Issue
/ Dhiraj Gaur <dhiraj.gaur(at)gmail.com>
I have been using Pound in my setup for quite sometime now. I have setup
various backends so that on the basis of URL request I can fetch pages from
various backend servers. For eg http://publ...
Intermittent iptables filter errors from pound requests
/ David Clark <dclark(at)avantlink.com>
Recently I've noticed some issues in the pound logs where a connection
to the back-end server timed out, e.g.:
Nov 4 03:13:11 balance1 pound: backend 220.127.116.11:80 connect:
SSL Renegotiation Vulnerability
/ "(private) HKS" <hks.private(at)gmail.com>
I assume Pound is vulnerable to this since it seems to be a flaw in
the actual protocol design, but can anyone confirm?
Log format in GMT only?
/ "Eric B." <ebenze(at)hotmail.com>
I noticed that all my log entries are time/date stamped at GMT. Is this the
only way to get log information from Pound? Or can this be customized? Or
is this a system configuration setup tha...
Takes ages before backends are detected as up
/ Tremolo 3molo <tremolo3molo(at)gmail.com>
We're running pound with a lot of backends on a lot of different
ListenHTTP/HTTPS directives (different certificates). A grep of BackEnd and
wc -l on pound.cfg reveals 732(!).
We also use extreme...
Re: [Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c
/ Albert <pound(at)alacra.com>
We're still seeing this problem. I did a quick diff between 2.4.5 and
2.5c, and only had a question about the new check on line 134 inside
get_line function (in the new code):
if(buf[i] == '\0') ...